Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  116 / 196 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 116 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

116

86

Daniel O’Neill (1920-1974)

The Flower Girl

Oil on board, 56 x 40.5cm (22 x 16”)

Signed

Daniel O’Neill’s wife, Eileen, whom he married in 1943, recalled in conversation that O’Neill was not

interested in working directly from the model. However, she also stated that while she did not actually

pose for him, it was her image which inspired his work of the 1940s and early 50s.

1

In Eileen, O’Neill

had found the embodiment of his ideal feminine form and in

The Flower Girl

he gives full expression to

his feeling, employing the full range of the newly discovered techniques he was experimenting with at

the time.

The placing in a parkland setting, embroidered with millefiori, reinforces the romantic nature of the image

as does the crinoline dress.The blue and green colour harmonies unify the composition and the vigorous

treatment both in brushwork and impasto effects, modified by subtle glazes, transcend the subject and

become the primary interest.

Not interested in making naturalistic representations on canvas, O’Neill’s subjects became the vehicle for

the expression of his own intense feeling, and even at this early stage of his career as a painter, he had

developed an impressive skill in the handling of pigment with a delight in its application.

James McIntyre, on a visit to O’Neill’s studio, was impressed by his glazes and delicate impasto effects

which had been achieved by applying the paint directly, through a small hole pierced in the cap of a paint

tube and extruded directly on to the surface of the work, thus creating a raised contour.

2

This technique

is used to great effect in

The Flower Girl,

particularly in defining the foreground flowers and in the sug-

gestion of texture on the bodice of the dress and decorative defining line on the skirt. The treatment of

the framing trees in free brushwork, creates an interesting counterpoint to the more detailed aspects of

the composition. Critic Edward Sheehy, noted that O’Neill ‘has an imagination which transmutes rather

than translates reality’.

3

From the beginning O’Neill displayed an innate feeling for colour as a means to create mood and atmos-

phere. He also realized that surface quality was an important element in painting as it allowed for the

exploration of the abstract qualities of the chosen medium.This device facilitated transcending the subject

matter and, in so doing, becomes the main focus of the work in process.

O’Neill’s second solo exhibition was held at the Waddington Gallery, Dublin, during September 1949.

The wide variety of theme, colour and treatment of the work was favourably commented on, with

The Mat-

ador

attracting attention for “its dignity not untouched by pathos”.

4

In this work, the painter used many

of the techniques previously employed in

The Flower Girl

and, inretrospect, the critical comment could be

equally applied to this piece.

Anne-Marie Keaveney BA Fine Art (Painting) MLitt Visual Culture.

1

O’Neill, M., interview, London, 13 February 1999

2

McIntyre, J., interview Greenisland, Co. Antrim, 13 November 1998

3

Sheehy, Edward,The Dublin Magazine, September, 1949

4

Social and Personal, October 1949, p.28

€15,000 - 20,000